SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Section vs 175 mile Rule

Subject: [SECC] Section vs 175 mile Rule
From: AB4RU@aol.com (AB4RU@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:43:22 EST
--part1_da.12f7fe12.2989ed2a_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


All,

The rule change is something that has been presented to the MSC many times 
over the years. It is designed to allow areas like Florida that is limited by 
the 175 mile rule, due to the geographic location, to have more members in a 
club. There has been a lot of controversy over this issue and I am surprised 
it was finally adopted. I was involved with this issue a few years back 
during my term as CAC for the SE section.   

I think changing the SECC to a section will SUCK. We have become a closer 
group of amateurs through the SECC reflector and team efforts in contesting 
over the years. I am not ready to throw that out the window because the ARRL 
changed the rules. I would like to have the stations that live out of the 175 
circle in the SECC, but certainly not at the expense of loosing our 
established members, regardless of how much better the club score could do. I 
am only one vote but if the SECC wants my scores, the 175 mile rule will stay 
in effect. 

Lets put this issue to bed and get back to focusing on contesting issues that 
are important. The guys leading the contest efforts have done a great job to 
promote interest in various contest over the past few months. Lets think of 
other new ways to keep the momentum going. 

Ya, I live in Georgia,

Ron W4WA

--part1_da.12f7fe12.2989ed2a_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=3><BR>
All,<BR>
<BR>
The rule change is something that has been presented to the MSC many times over 
the years. It is designed to allow areas like Florida that is limited by the 
175 mile rule, due to the geographic location, to have more members in a club. 
There has been a lot of controversy over this issue and I am surprised it was 
finally adopted. I was involved with this issue a few years back during my term 
as CAC for the SE section.&nbsp;&nbsp; <BR>
<BR>
I think changing the SECC to a section will SUCK. We have become a closer group 
of amateurs through the SECC reflector and team efforts in contesting over the 
years. I am not ready to throw that out the window because the ARRL changed the 
rules. I would like to have the stations that live out of the 175 circle in the 
SECC, but certainly not at the expense of loosing our established members, 
regardless of how much better the club score could do. I am only one vote but 
if the SECC wants my scores, the 175 mile rule will stay in effect. <BR>
<BR>
Lets put this issue to bed and get back to focusing on contesting issues that 
are important. The guys leading the contest efforts have done a great job to 
promote interest in various contest over the past few months. Lets think of 
other new ways to keep the momentum going. <BR>
<BR>
Ya, I live in Georgia,<BR>
<BR>
Ron W4WA</FONT></HTML>

--part1_da.12f7fe12.2989ed2a_boundary--

--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [SECC] Section vs 175 mile Rule, AB4RU@aol.com <=