On 7/16/02 10:25 PM, Dick Bentley at k2uft@yahoo.com wrote:
>AA4LR wondered out loud how N5TJ/K1TO popped back into
>first place - part of the answer is in the fine print
>at the bottom of the final results panel: "Some
>softwares used by teams did not count multipliers
>correctly. This is the reason why some claimed scores
>were changed just after the contest on the
>scoreboard."
Huh. As I read the rules, didn't the teams have to all use the same
software? (I think there were two approved programs)
>It would be interesting to get John & Bill's
>perspective on the vast difference in scores. The
>operators were 104 of the world's finest, the stations
>were supposedly equal in performance and yet there is
>a difference of almost a million points between number
>1 team and number 52 team. Other than software
>differences, what were the causes?
Or better yet, what are N5TJ/K1TO doing to remain on top? What do they do
that others don't?
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
|