SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] CQWW RTTY Results

Subject: [SECC] CQWW RTTY Results
From: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Sun Sep 26 21:00:25 2004
Why does RTTY advocates think it is alright, cool or whatever to run that
mode ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE BOTTOM END OF FORTY METERS?  I am really
getting sick and tired of it.

Dan/W4NTI



> [Original Message]
> From: AE4Y <ae4y@mindspring.com>
> To: SECC <secc@contesting.com>
> Date: 9/26/04 6:42:20 PM
> Subject: [SECC] CQWW RTTY Results
>
> There was lots of activity in this weekend's CQWW RTTY Contest.  I put 
> in about 5-6 hours between yardwork, football, and soccer games.  Those 
> of you who haven't tried RTTY contesting ought to give it a shot.
>
> Even thought I was strictly part-time, I was bound and determined to get 
> to 200 QSOs; just made it.  Here's my results:
>
> SOLP All Bands  ~ 5 hours
>
>          Band    QSOs    Pts  Cty   ZN
>           3.5      18     18   13    2
>             7      60     88   35   11
>            14      73    126   39   12
>            21      48    118   28   14
>            28       3      9    3    2
>         Total     202    359  118   41
>
>
>       Final Score : 57,081
>
>
> Kent, AE4Y
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>