SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] 40M Bandplan <was> CQWW RTTY Results

Subject: [SECC] 40M Bandplan <was> CQWW RTTY Results
From: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Sep 28 10:37:05 2004
Unfortunately it is a no win situation on 40 meters when there is a major SSB
or RTTY contest. I think there is gentleman's agreement that RTTY is .080 and 
above on all the bands. There is way too much activity to fit in that spectrum 
and also 7050 and above on SSB. Too bad we have to wait so long for the FCC the 
change the band allocation.... It needs to be done now !!!

I'm sure the guy on CW was not intentionally jamming you Jon...  I have to 
admit I have infringed up in the RTTY part of 20 meters during CW SS to find
a clear frequency and all of a sudden someone will send RTTY on top of me. I 
assume that might of been intentional to tell me to move but I'm not sure.
Maybe the same thing might be happening between the CW vs RTTY guys ???

                73, Jeff



> 
> From: Schulz Jonathan <jonathan.schulz@siemens.com>
> Date: 2004/09/28 Tue AM 09:48:46 EDT
> To: "'secc@contesting.com'" <secc@contesting.com>
> Subject: [SECC] 40M Bandplan <was>  CQWW RTTY Results
> 
> >From ARRL, ( http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/bandplan.html )
> 
> 40 Meters (7.0-7.3 MHz):
> 7.040 RTTY DX 
> 7.080-7.100 RTTY 
> 
> I was working guys above 7.04, found a run freq ~7.048, and 7.052 (where I
> was jammed by a cw type)
> 
> How much lower in frequency were guys going?
> 
> 73
> Jon
> K9JS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material
> protected by state and federal law. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use by other persons or entities is strictly
> prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or
> an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, kindly
> contact the sender and delete the material, including any attachments, in
> any form and from any computer.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AE4Y [mailto:ae4y@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 4:10 PM
> To: SECC
> Subject: Re: [SECC] CQWW RTTY Results
> 
> 
> I believe that it's primarily due to the fact that the Europeans have to 
> operate down there on RTTY.  If you want to work them, you gotta call 
> them where they're listening.
> 
> Kent, AE4Y
> 
> Daniel Jeswald wrote:
> 
> > Why does RTTY advocates think it is alright, cool or whatever to run that
> > mode ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE BOTTOM END OF FORTY METERS?  I am really
> > getting sick and tired of it.
> > 
> > Dan/W4NTI
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>