> -----Original Message-----
> From: secc-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of ku8e at bellsouth.net
> Sent: Tuesday, 08 March, 2005 15:53
> To: secc at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [SECC] Thanks!
>
>
> Jay...
>
> Hopefully we will have more fixed station activity this year.
> If you look at the 2004 results
> there were only 10 fixed station entries from GA
Jeff, I am very sure you had more than 10 fixed stn entries from GA.
Why? Because there would have been 11 fixed stns *if* you had included
my QRP log. ;)
I reminded you at least twice via email that my log was not in the RCVD
LOGS list. And, I resubmitted my log and summary to you with each
reminder so you would not have to dig into your email archives.
To wit:
-----Original Message-----
From: ku8e at bellsouth.net [mailto:ku8e at bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, 04 February, 2005 10:12
To: Matt at HiWAAY.net
Cc: secc at contesting.com
Subject: Re: SECOND FOLLOW-UP FW: WB6BWZ log & summary for GaQP 2004
I am forwarding my reply to Matt's questions to the whole club....
<snipped>
<eof>
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Lee, K4AQ [mailto:Matt at HiWAAY.net]
Sent: Thursday, 03 February, 2005 23:48
To: 'ku8e at bellsouth.net'
Cc: John Laney K4BAI (k4bai at worldnet.att.net)
Subject: SECOND FOLLOW-UP FW: WB6BWZ log & summary for GaQP 2004
Importance: High
SECOND FOLLOW-UP.
<snipped>
<eof>
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Lee, K4AQ [mailto:Matt at Hiwaay.net]
Sent: Monday, 31 January, 2005 17:55
To: ku8e at bellsouth.net
Cc: John Laney K4BAI
Subject: FW: WB6BWZ log & summary for GaQP 2004
Jeff,
1. What is the status re: GaQP 2004 Results?
2. http://gqp.contesting.com/logs_received.htm
I submitted my log and summary to you on 11-Apr-2004 but I am not in
the "Logs Received" list as of 05-May-2004. Please advise.
<snipped>
<eof>
Jeff, your email dtd 04-Feb-2005 to the reflector indicates your receipt
of my 03-Feb-2005 email.
Could there be other logs that you rcvd that were not included in the
RESULTS?
Please understand that I am only taking issue with your opening
statement and not the difficult job of volunteering to bring the 2004
GQP to a proper closure. I appreciate and thank you for doing that.
> Thanks again for Mike and Tom for stepping forward in keeping
> the GQP going.
Yes, thank you, Mike and Tom.
...
--
Matt Lee, K4AQ
Atlanta, GA USA
<K4AQ at arrl.net>
> > From: Jay Pryor <jpryor at uga.edu>
> > Date: 2005/03/08 Tue PM 03:19:09 EST
> > To: SECC at contesting.com
> > Subject: [SECC] Thanks!
> >
> > We all need to be nice to NE4S for agreeing to handle the
> > GQP. It appeared
> > that our contest was in danger of disappearing because of lack of
> > leadership, and after K4BAI and others worked so hard to
> > resurrect it just
> > a few years ago, that would have been a shame.
> >
> > While I am at it, I also want to thank Tom, W4BQF for
> > volunteering to
> > handle the plaques. Tom and I have communicated directly
> > and I'll be
> > handling the plaques again for 2006 but that will be my
> > final year at that task.
> >
> > So thanks to both Mike and Tom. The next round (for you
> > two) is on me.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Jay, K4OGG
|