SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] TS (TB-WIRES) or not?

Subject: [SECC] TS (TB-WIRES) or not?
From: nj8j at arrl.net (Ben Coleman)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:24:09 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In the past, when I was running only a single-wire antenna, I didn't feel any
problem with entering WPX in the TS (or TB-WIRES) category.  I didn't have the
TB, but I definitely had the wires.  This time I was running a vertical
(Antron A99) on 10 and 15, plus the single-wire antenna on 80-20.  It's
definitely less of an antenna setup than TB-WIRES, but it doesn't really fit
the description.  I guess that puts me in the normal SOAB category?

Ben
- --
Ben Coleman nj8j at arrl.net
 "I love the way Microsoft follows standards.  In much the
same manner that fish follow migrating caribou."
                                            Paul Tomblin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEKt7ZRgRgmxNburQRAnnjAJ9UmuwTHAzykhec/7vXCWlHa2IfEgCZASwG
Yo+QCEBhO0nJNUewq1nLcII=
=Ixnw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>