SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion]

Subject: [SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion]
From: k4hal at arrl.net (Henry Wingate)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:37:20 -0500


I for one, really enjoyed the RTTY contest. I operated entirely S&P and 
did not hear ANY activity above 7100. Only BC stns and some SSB. I 
sorted my log by frequency and broke it down by lowest and highest freq 
QSO as follows:
on 40
Lowest freq              highest freq
7030(LU7HN)           7079(W9XT)

on 20
lowest freq.               highest freq
14061(SV3DCX)        14140(EE7CQ)


Most of my QSO's took place between these frequencies. I did not use use 
frequencies above 7100 because there simply were no stations there!
About an hour after the contest I tuned the 40 meter CW band from 7000 
to 7100 an counted four (4) QSO's. It was even worse on 80 with only 2 
QSO's from 3500 to 3600.



Dan/W4NTI wrote:
> The real reason that there is a problem NOW is because up till the RTTY 
> contests started clobbering the prime CW area's of especially 
> 40m......there wasn't a problem of major consequence. 
>   
>   


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 9/26/2006


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 9/26/2006





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 9/26/2006

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion], Henry Wingate <=