SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] Were you intending to enter as Classic and Assi

Subject: [SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] Were you intending to enter as Classic and Assisted???
From: k4bai at att.net (John Laney)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:44:59 -0400


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        [CQ-Contest] Were you intending to enter as Classic and 
Assisted???
Date:   Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:19:09 -0400
From:   Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr at contesting.com>
To:     reflector cq-contest <CQ-Contest at Contesting.COM>



The sponsors say they are getting a lot of logs that show the Classic
overlay category and Assisted.  Under the rules, this is not a possible
category, because Classic entries must be UNassisted.  A lot of contest
software - N1MM Logger is one - defaults to Assisted, and unless you
consciously change this, you could wind up being  reclassified from
Classic and relegated to the single op assisted category.

If you are one of those who made this mistake, there is still time to
resubmit your log with the corrected categories.

-- 

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] Were you intending to enter as Classic and Assisted???, John Laney <=