> I was just testing the new 2-radio naming feature in TR 6.21 (thanks for
> implementing my request Tree!). I ran what could be a problem if you
> leave your log with the radio (or multi) name after the QSO number and
> use the ARRL format conversion routine. The Callsigns are shifted to the
> left one position from normal (if you didnt use radio numbering) in the
> ARRL formatted log. This was evident when I started out without naming
> the radios and then changed mid-log.
>
> This may not be a problem if you strip the ID's from your log before
> submission, (which I guess would be prudent). Nevertheless it happens.
> I confirmed this with my old CQWW logs where we operated multi with a
> network -- of course we dont submit CQWW logs in ARRL format now do we??
This really isn't an issue for the ARRL. The data isn't in assigned
or fixed columns.
Tree
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|