> Is the Cabrillo in 6.48 OK for the ARRL? Just wanted to check...
I think so. Cabrillo isn't required yet anyway and once again, this
is a situation where the guy writting the checking software is the same
one that wrote POST.
Just make sure that it shows all the information you would need. I
think it doesn't show the sent information if you are DX (and maybe
USA), but that isn't a show stopper at this point.
> Also, since the cabrillo format seems to have summary sheet info in it, =
> I presume that is all that is needed for the ARRL. IN other words, no =
> seperate summary sheet text file required?
Right - that is really one of the big reasons we came up with this
specification.
Tree
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|