On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:26:17AM -0400, Ted Sarah wrote:
>
> We tried all the examples that have been mentioned with the KG4xx
> and NONE of them worked. We tried 59 <ENTER>, and yes it worked
> for ALL other DX contacts. We tried 59 DX, we tried DX, we tried
> 1D, etc. We finally just entered it as 1D PR and it took it. It
I think that KG4xx should be either VI or PR a far at the ARRL
is concerned - and so I think TR-Log deals with them in this way.
So if you enter a section for the KG4xx it will work.
This is a very rare case so it has not be tested much.
I would think that Guantanamo Bay would be in an ARRL section and
could even enter SS etc - based on past ARRL patterens that
had the Canal Zone as a section.
> appears that because the FCC is now (thanks for nothing) issuing
> KG for state side, that TR may be set up to accept it as a U.S.
> only call, when there are some that are really GITMO. I've even
> tried it at home later and it WILL NOT accept it as a DX prefix
> no matter what I do.
TR-Log will log KG4xx as a Guantanamo Bay callsign - as it should.
Call in the format of KG4x or KG4xxx are USA callsigns are are
treated as such by TR-Log.
In a sense it is really (in the big picture) a non-issue since the
ARRL does not want you to send in logs for FD - only dupe sheets
so what or how you log the exchange is not critcal - even if it does
stop your run and confuse you for a bit.
--
George Fremin III
Johnson City, Texas "Experiment trumps theory."
K5TR (ex.WB5VZL) -- Dave Leeson W6NL
geoiii@kkn.net
830-868-2510
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|