TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[TRLog] 6 band change rule

Subject: [TRLog] 6 band change rule
From: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 19:25:40 -0500
Exactly. The hour is defined as n:00 through and including n:59. Six
changes in that period. NOTHING to do with the clock, other than the
definition of the hour. You can go 50 minutes on a run on twenty and
then go 40, 10, 15, 80, 160 and back to 20 in the last ten minutes.

Band change count is already there.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve London" <n2ic0@hotmail.com>
To: <tree@kkn.net>; <trlog@contesting.com>
Cc: <n1nd@arrl.org>; <trey@kkn.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [TRLog] 6 band change rule


What's going on here ?  There is a 6 band change/hour rule for M/S in
ARRL
DX.  No need to keep track of any 10 minute clock.  TR already handles
the 6
band change/hour rule just fine by setting the HOUR DISPLAY to BAND
CHANGES.

73,
Steve, N2IC


>From: Tree N6TR <tree@kkn.net>
>To: trlog@contesting.com
>CC: n1nd@arrl.org, trey@kkn.net
>Subject: [TRLog] 6 band change rule
>Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:02:11 -0800
>
>K5NZ writes:
>
>  > Keeping up with the 6 band change rule for ARRL M/S is a mess.
Why do
>we not
>  > have a feature in TR to help keep up with this?  We had a 10 min
clock
>and it
>  > worked great?  Is this too hard to add?  We made 2 mistakes this
>weekend and
>  > I asked ARRL how I could remove those QSO's so not to hurt the
station
>we
>  > worked.  Now they say we have to be M/M for 2 mistakes. BS anyone
else
>would
>  > just wipe the QSO's and send in the log, happens all the time.
>
>I think the first sentence answers the question asked in the second
>sentence
>better than I can.
>
>While I haven't tried to put a specific feature in to deal with the
10
>minute
>rule, I did try doing off time once or twice.  I gave up and took it
out.
>
>Whenever I have thought about putting something like this in, I end
up
>drowning
>in all of the special cases that come up.  I have done this enough
times,
>that
>I try to refrain from thinking about them.
>
>This is also an interesting case - since I am also the one doing the
log
>checking
>with the software.  Special cases like this are impossible to deal
with.  I
>can't
>"not count these two QSOs in one log, but make sure they don't count
as
>NILs in
>the other logs" without a lot of manual work - and prone to errors.
>
>There are no easy answers.  I can look into adding some kind of
feature to
>make
>management of the 10 minute rule easier - but I can't guarantee that
the
>same
>thing won't happen again.
>
>You have probably put yourself at a disadvantage by trying to do the
right
>thing.
>
>Tree
>_______________________________________________
>TRLog mailing list
>TRLog@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

_______________________________________________
TRLog mailing list
TRLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>