TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Alternatives to the J-38

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Alternatives to the J-38
From: troy_wideman@eee.org (Troy Wideman)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 09:35:51 -0800

--------------BEE52262C06AC1F253E3E5AA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mike, the old Navy key was a jewel and I preferred it to the J-38 ( "the
real thing") that I had. Unfortunately, as I was transferred around by
Uncle Sam, both keys were "lost" (?) during one of the moves. Also, I
can't recall the official nomenclature for the Navy key. But, the Navy
key would hold the adjustment better than any key I ever owned.
     73, Troy, W6HV

Mike Siegel wrote:

>  Well fellas, in my post to Tom, I guess I spoke a bit to generically.
> Of course, the genuine J-38 is very collectable, and quite pricey. On
> the other hand, there are some fairly high-quality knock-offs that
> will do a good job for a beginner. And some of the Nye versions of
> that design are excellent (although I never cared much for the Master
> Key). On the other hand, my very favorite straight key is the old Navy
> Sparkless Safety key - black crinkle finish, with the contacts
> isolated in a sealed chamber. This key has the best feel I've ever
> found in a straight key of any design. The last time I heard, in lower
> CA they were selling still new in the box for $40-$60. If you can find
> one. I hate to be the one to say it, but if you look around at
> anything requiring tools,  the better tools cost more money. And CW,
> unfortunately, is the same. All we can do is bite the bullet, and try
> to remember a little charity with the new guys... BTW, does anyone
> know the correct nomenclature for that old Navy key? 73 to all, Mike
> KI6PREl Rancho R.F., CA

--------------BEE52262C06AC1F253E3E5AA
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Mike, the old Navy key was a jewel and I preferred it to the J-38 ( "the
real thing") that I had. Unfortunately, as I was transferred around by
Uncle Sam, both keys were "lost" (?) during one of the moves. Also, I can't
recall the official nomenclature for the Navy key. But, the Navy key would
hold the adjustment better than any key I ever owned.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 73, Troy, W6HV
<p>Mike Siegel wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;<font face="Lucida Casual"><font 
color="#000000"><font size=+1>Well
fellas, in my post to Tom, I guess I spoke a bit to generically. Of course,
the genuine J-38 is very collectable, and quite pricey. On the other hand,
there are some fairly high-quality knock-offs that will do a good job for
a beginner. And some of the Nye versions of that design are excellent (although
I never cared much for the Master Key).</font></font></font>&nbsp;<font 
face="Lucida Casual"><font color="#000000"><font size=+1>On
the other hand, my very favorite straight key is the old Navy Sparkless
Safety key - black crinkle finish, with the contacts isolated in a sealed
chamber. This key has the best feel I've ever found in a straight key of
any design. The last time I heard, in lower CA they were selling still
new in the box for $40-$60. If you can find 
one.</font></font></font>&nbsp;<font face="Lucida Casual"><font 
color="#000000"><font size=+1>I
hate to be the one to say it, but if you look around at anything requiring
tools,&nbsp; the better tools cost more money. And CW, unfortunately, is
the same. All we can do is bite the bullet, and try to remember a little
charity with the new guys...</font></font></font>&nbsp;<font face="Lucida 
Casual"><font color="#000000"><font size=+1>BTW,
does anyone know the correct nomenclature for that old Navy 
key?</font></font></font>&nbsp;<font face="Lucida Casual"><font 
color="#000000"><font size=+1>73
to all,</font></font></font>&nbsp;<font face="Lucida Casual"><font 
color="#000000"><font size=+1>Mike
KI6PR</font></font></font><font face="Lucida Casual"><font 
color="#000000"><font size=+1>El
Rancho R.F., CA</font></font></font>&nbsp;</blockquote>

</body>
</html>

--------------BEE52262C06AC1F253E3E5AA--


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>