On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:51:32 -0500 "Alex Mendelsohn"
<alex.ai2q@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>Hi Joe:
>
>That's a good point. Why don't we simply run a ten Tec net on CW, say
>at
>14045 kHz, for example?
Good idea Alex, and with your experience, you would make a good Net
Control
Station. I have trouble keeping up with my weekly sked on 160, but a
daily net,
it seems, would be automatic.
It would make for good CW practice. We could have a net on 14025 @
25wpm,
14030 @ 30 wpm, 14035 @ 35 wpm, etc.
73,
de Joe, AA4NN
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|