TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Ten Tec and RF

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Ten Tec and RF
From: W7TS@ibm.net (Ken Kinyon)
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 17:04:11 -0600
Amen,
Even if it added a few hundred dollars.
73,
Ken W7TS

------------------------
Kenneth E.  Kinyon
34 Princeton Circle
Longmont, CO 80503-2106
Voice/fax  (303) 684-0037
E-mail W7TS@ibm.net
ALPCA #8339
ARRL-LM

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tentec@contesting.com [mailto:owner-tentec@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Carter Grabarczyk
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 1999 15:55
To: TenTec reflector
Subject: [TenTec] Ten Tec and RF



Been following the thread on the Omni VI+ and RF and all I can say is,
"Been there, done that". The Omni VI is a great rig, I love it and I
would buy it again in a minute! However, being a "great" rig does not
mean it is a perfect rig (which hasn't been built yet). 

Based on my experience and those of others on this reflector, RF
bypassing does seem to be a weak point in an otherwise excellent rig.

TT, if you ever build an Omni 7, please, please don't spare the bypass
caps and/or ferrite beads on EVERY port/plug/connector on the radio. So
what if it adds another 20 or 30 bucks-it will save untold grief down
the road.

Just my 2 cents worth; and please, no flames- I wouln't part with my Six
for anything (well OK, an Omni Seven)
 
73/Carter/K8VT 
(who is now putting on his asbestos suit...  ;-)

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>