I have thought the same thing. I would think that any
kind of re-use of parts and designs would be
economically beneficial. There does seem to be some
slight differences in the receiver specs. How
significant are these?
--- Vin Legare <vin@midmaine.com> wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about getting an TT RX320. In
> the process I note that the
> specs for both the Pegasus and RX320 are almost the
> same ... for the features
> that the RX320 has. Has anyone had the opportunity
> to compare them? Would be
> interested in your comments. With the excellent
> review that the 320 has rcv'd
> it looks like TT expanded their 320 and added xmtr
> boards plus sw enhancements
> to achieve the Pegasus.
>
> Vin W1TUJ
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:
> tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:
> owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search:
> http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
===
-Bob Wooldridge KC0DXF
-Web Mail: kc0dxf@yahoo.com
-Web: http://www.qsl.net/kc0dxf/
-See Also: http://www.anet-stl.com/~mcsg/
-Via HAM radio repeaters in St. Louis: 146.85, 442.10
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|