absolutely! this should be the standard procedure on this reflector!
bob/n9jak
-----Original Message-----
From: randas@mindspring.com <randas@mindspring.com>
To: David B. Perrin <d_perrin@conknet.com>; tentec reflec
<tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector space
>
>Have to disagree with you on this one David. I find it nice to reread the
>original post. What IS nice is to have everyone respond on top of the
>message instead of under it.
>
>73 de Tim K0FL
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David B. Perrin <d_perrin@conknet.com>
>To: tentec reflec <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>Date: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 6:43 AM
>Subject: [TenTec] Reflector space
>
>
>>
>>Hi-
>> If we would just not REPLY to messages posted on this reflector, we
>>could save lots of space, and time as we now have to page down through
>>all the re-listed messages to which people are replying.
>> Instead of hitting the REPLY button, send a new message to the
>>reflector.
>> Personally, I am excited to see all the new ideas, but get tired of
>>reading everyone's re-listing of what will be the focus of what they
>>offer.
>>
>>73 de dave in NH
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|