I have not met a rig yet that I could not modify for use elsewhere in the HF
band. It is a very rare opportunity to gain some fine DX capable frequencies
in this domain. It would be a shame for any licensed HAM not to be all for
this measure.80/75 meters has too much noise and mental illness present
(high end of phone area), and 40 has the popular broadcasters. Something in
between would be superb. Just my opinion.
73
Patrick /K9PF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Bridges" <radiobridge@infoave.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:50 PM
Subject: [TenTec] 5.2 mhz amateur band
> Has anyone noticed that the FCC is accepting comments on ARRL's petition
> seeking allocation of 5.2 to 5.4 mhz to the amateur service? My question:
> Is the Omni VI+ modifiable to this new band? If not I cannot see how I
> could afford to be for this petition. In which case: what are good
> arguments against this new band?! Anyone have any ideas they would like to
> share? Tnx 73s de KJ4ZM Sam
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|