Re: [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews

To:	<w8au@sssnet.com>, <Tentec@contesting.com>
Subject:	Re: [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews
From:	"Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:59:26 -1000
List-post:	<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

> 
> My "weighting scale" is 90% on tests and facts,

I find the ARRL lab "Expanded Test Reports",  which are
ALL data,  to be just great!  Nothing subjective there.

73,  Jim  KH7M

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, (continued) Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Tom Rauch Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, cherry Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, George, W5YR Re: [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dave McClafferty [TenTec] Save the Memories!, Bill Ames Re: [TenTec] Save the Memories!, j Re: [TenTec] Save the Memories!, Carl Moreschi Re: [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, w8au Re: [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, Jim Reid <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [TenTec] ARRL reviews, James Duffer
Next by Date:	Re: Re:[TenTec] Performance Measures in QST, Stuart Rohre
Previous by Thread:	Re: [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, w8au
Next by Thread:	[TenTec] FS/Trade : Pegasus Station, NZ8J
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]