| To: | n4lq@iglou.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Sidetone revisited |
| From: | "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer" <geraldj@isunet.net> |
| Reply-to: | geraldj@isunet.net |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2002 10:23:41 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The filtered sawtooth will always have the least delay. The filter can be a simple two or three pole low pass. The effect of the twin T is to make a narrow bandpass filter and its high Q in the feedback position of an op amp makes its output slow to change. If there's lots of signal from the sawtooth, a simple RC filter which looses amplitude rapidly with the increasing stages can clean the sawtooth adequately. No need for high Q components from either inductors or the feedback of an op amp. 73, Jerry, K0CQ -- Entire content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson. Reproduction by permission only. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Sidetone revisited, n4lq |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Possible explanation for problem(s) with Jupiter finals, William F. Mansey; WA2PVK |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Sidetone revisited, n4lq |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Sidetone revisited, n4lq |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |