Paul,
I'm sure no one will lose any sleep over this, but I
too have NO intention to join a "splinter" TT group.
Personally I see no merit to it. If this TT reflector
was saturated with traffic, it might be worth establishing a separate
reflector..BUT that is not the case. I wish them good luck...but
question the rationale for it....I think everyone loses in this case.
Just my 2 cents...
73
Tony, W4FOA
Paul Valko wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > >This is Fri morning (12:15 am) and no postings yet
> > >about the new Argonaut V.
>
> > There are several comments at the Ten-Tec516 group at Yahoo.
>
> Ok... I for one am going on record to say I will NOT join another Ten-Tec
> reflector. I have at least three reasons for taking this stand.
>
> 1 - The Ten*Tec community is simply too small to endure this type of
> Balkanization within our ranks.
> 2 - As we've seen with QRP-L, FT-817, etc. When some people post messages
> they deem important they copy both groups giving the rest of us a double
> dose of "For Sale" ads and of course the beloved "TEST DO NOT READ" posts.
> 3 - Yet another source of unwanted SPAM and off topic posts.
>
> Will I miss out on Argonaut 5 news? No doubt. But I'm personally drawing a
> line in the sand on this issue and would be pleased if some of you Argo 5
> owners would do likewise and continue to report here, on the 'net's original
> and best Ten*Tec reflector.
>
> I would also hope that our friends at Ten*Tec continue to post Argo 5 and
> Orion news here as opposed to these other reflectors.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> 73! =paul= W8KC
> Collector of Ten*Tecs and Other Fine Plastics.
> Visit the Virtual Ten*Tec Museum at http://mywebpages.comcast.net/w8kc
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|