TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] TT net on 7.288

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] TT net on 7.288
From: mrhinkel@ix.netcom.com (Mark Hinkel)
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:30:09 -0500
Hi Roger,

The average dipole really is a good antenna, and you have yours elavated
quite a bit.  I would not call it a "poor antenna system" at all...   I
only wish I could get mine up 30ft.

I use the Corsair II, a Ham band only receiver.  No chance to listen to
SWL here.  And yes, I wish I had a Paragon too...

Mark Hinkel   WA3QVU
Willow Grove, Pa.



roger wrote:
> 
> I have Monitored the TenTec net frequently  since it has been on 7.288. I
> have never had any type of problems or even heard the swbc stations. I live
> in North Alabama and only have a dipole up at about 50 feet using the
> Paragon receiver  Several of the fellows mention the swbc almost every time.
> I'm just curious as to what is the difference, My poor antenna system,
> Location, etc. There are very seldom anyone that checks that I have problems
> copying. One thing that you mentioned is where the swbc originates. The
> direction of my antenna null may be towards Havana
> KO4O
> 
> > Wanted to check into the net last nite but a strong SWBC station on 7.290
> is wiping you out.This station (Havana?) starts its interval sig at 2355 UTC
> and signs on at 0000 UTC.While I can copy ur station 10/15 over,the splatter
> smothers the weaker sigs.B/W of 1800 Hz and PBT of -350/400 helps
> somewhat.While I realize clear freqs on 40 at nite are at a premium,maybe
> the net should try to find a better one not so close to a SWBC station.
> > 73 de Bill W4NJF
> >
> > Bill Fulling
> > w4njf@email.midflorida.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TenTec] TT net on 7.288, Mark Hinkel <=