I was not able to detect any such behavior. It really was a big plus for
me.
Gary. AA2IZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <N4NT@charter.net>
To: "Vernon J. Kunes, Jr." <vern@mantlelamp.com>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 4 pole vs 8 pole filter in Corsair
> But isn't the Inrad a lattice filter that is prone to exaggerating static
> crashes as compared with the Ten-Tec filters?
>
> Mike N4NT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vernon J. Kunes, Jr." <vern@mantlelamp.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:39 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] 4 pole vs 8 pole filter in Corsair
>
>
> Anytime you add more poles of filtering, it is a benefit (up to the point
of
> dimishing return). TenTec made this upgrade in the Corsair II, since all
of
> them were shipped with 8 pole filters in the 9mhz IF. If you really want
to
> get hot, you can go to the Inrad 10 pole 9mhz filter (Inrad doesn't list
it
> for the Corsair, But my friend Gary, AA2IZ, a frequent contributor here
has
> one in his, and he will definately tell you it works). Cheers. Vern
N2YZS
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|