Also, the rx320 does not have a TCXO. It drifts a few hundred hertz
for an hour or so at startup. The Pegasus and Jupiter are rock stable right
from the start.
Carl Moreschi N4PY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
To: <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>; "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>;
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX-320
> Also, no FM reception. I agree, it's a great receiver.
>
> Mark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
> To: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 13:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX-320
>
>
> > On 8 Dec 2002 at 23:14, Carl Moreschi wrote:
> >
> > > The only real differences are no attenuator, no rf gain control, no
> > > noise blanker, no noise reduction, and no auto notch. Also, it runs
> > > at 1200 baud instead of 57600 baud so it responds much slower to
> > > comands and is easy to overrun with software commands. But it's
> > > receiver performance is surprisingly good. I rate it the best
> > > receiver buy in ham radio.
> > >
> > I concur. May be one of the best kept secrets around.
> >
> > I like to have an RF gain on a receiver so I simply wired a 500
> > ohm pot between the antenna cable and the antenna input
> > connector. Really helps when the band is full of BIG signals.
> >
> > -73-
> >
> > -Lee-
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|