TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Omni VI encoder

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Omni VI encoder
From: kw0d@netexpress.net (Dave Kamp, KW0D)
Date: Thu Feb 20 17:54:27 2003
I used a cheap mechanical unit... lessee... GH3071ND  a 36 position PC
mount ... $4.70 each... totally mechanical variety.  I could've gotten a
more expensive optical device, but it shouldn'tve made any difference for
prototyping a 301 knockoff.  Here's a scratch-drawing of the interface...


At 01:23 PM 02/20/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Dave,
>
>Thanks. What's the part number from Digi-Key?
>
>Mark
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Dave Kamp, KW0D" <kw0d@netexpress.net>
>To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:56 AM
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI encoder
>
>
>> Hi Mark!
>> 
>> I'm working on plans and parts-list for one... even have a prototype with
>> an encoder I got from Digi-Key... my only stumbling-block is that I can't
>> get my VI to see the encoder... and I think the problem is with the VI.
>> Haven't had time to diagnose it yet.
>> 
>> DK  :-)
>> 
>> At 08:03 AM 02/20/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>> >Anyone have a 301 encoder for the Omni VI available?
>> >
>> >Anyone have any plans for building something comparable with avaialable
>> >parts?
>> >
>> >73,
>> >Mark
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >TenTec mailing list
>> >TenTec@contesting.com
>> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 73's from KW0D Dave in LeClaire, Iowa
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>-------------- next part --------------

---------------------------------------------------------
73's from KW0D Dave in LeClaire, Iowa
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>