To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Why Ethernet? |
From: | wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua) |
Date: | Mon Jun 2 14:26:00 2003 |
Just got back into town and noticed this thread. I am involved in the design of instruments for physics research. And one problem that we have encountered is the rapid change in computer technology making instruments that are perfectly suited for the job no longer useful with the newer computers. In the 1980's is seemed that the standard was "S100". Before the PC's really hit the market big time. So we designed some instruments to fit onto S100 boards. We also used parallel interfaces in some instruments and serial in others. Then comes along the PCs. Well we could still use the parallel interfaces and serial interfaces but the S100 stuff had to be trashed. The people actually doing the programming (professors and graduate students) did understand BASIC and could write and modify their own programs. This is perfect because having a single programmer to funnel all this thru would be a serious problem and the graduate students would not gain the experience either. We had to decide where to go from here. The problem is that the parallel interfaces have gone, serial interfaces (rs232) to more than one instrument is a real problem using the new computers due to operating systems and visual basic etc.... What interface is most likely to survive for the next 10 years or so? USB has already been upgraded and firewire taking its place and then something else and something else etc.... But ether net is likely to be around for some time due to the fact that many buildings are wired for it and the owners of those buildings are not likely to want to rewire them for some time. Also, for about $50 each ((unit quantities from Lantronix) an OEM interface just a little larger than an ether net connector behaves like a nano-server and contains a micro controller that you can program to interface to your instrument and the nanoserver can be set up to look just like webpage (buttons and everything) with HTML etc. This way a person can control an instrument from any computer without special software. I suspect that equipment manufacturers all over are facing a similar problem and will be going to ether net. 73 Bill wa4lav |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Why Ethernet?, Dave Kamp, KW0D |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] On the practical side, Pete Smith |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Why Ethernet?, Grant Youngman |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Why Ethernet?, Jerry Harley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |