TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That

To: tentec@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That
From: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:03:42 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Ron,

It hurts to admit this, but I believe that in the matter of CW capability we
are up against the ugly realities of the marketplace.

The amateur segment is only a part of the  major Japanese radio equipment
manufacturers' overall customer base. They also supply the commercial,
governmental, military/paramilitary, maritime and aviation sectors.

Morse radiotelegraphy is all but extinct in these radio services (except for
some military special forces).  There is a very strong possibility that
WRC-2003 will repeal S.25.5 (the Morse code proficiency requirement in the
ARS). Considering all of this, it is easy to understand a manufacturer's
reluctance to devote significant R&D resources to enhanced CW capability in
HF equipment.

Nonetheless, it is regrettable that competing manufacturers do not wish to
expend just a few more R&D person-hours to refine and complete what is
already there, and working pretty well, albeit with a few warts. This is
especially true if a few firmware "tweaks" are all it takes.

If Ten-Tec can carve out a niche for itself as a supplier of CW-optimised HF
transceivers, it will have an assured market as long as there are amateur CW
operators.

Best 73,
Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ
North Vancouver, BC, Canada
http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/

-


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>