TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration
From: ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman)
Date: Wed Jun 4 16:53:55 2003
Appropros of that  (protecting the input with a pair of diodes), wouldn't it
be a good idea to protect our regular antenna connection in that exact same
manner ?   Sounds too simple, so I must be missing something.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration


> At 02:58 PM 6/4/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >Jim,
> >
> >When I was first hooking up my RX340, I accidentally plugged my HF
antenna
> >into the external reference input. The front panel LED actually lit
> >indicating that the RX340 had detected a 10 MHz reference signal
(probably
> >WWV) on that input. Since you are so close to WWVH, why don't you try
> >hooking up a 10 MHz antenna (as close as you are, maybe just the
proverbial
> >'wet noodle') to your RX340 reference input and see what happens?
>
> That certainly qualifies as an interesting idea, *but*:
>
> You might want to put a pair of 1v zener diodes (or any diode that'll
> conduct at approx 1 v) across the input, and you want to put a pair of
> tuned circuits -- one before the diodes, one after -- to keep your signal
> restricted to 10 MHz.
>
> You can use multiple frequencies as references -- see your manual.
Likewise,
> the standard input can only accept up to 1v p-p as input.
>
> Nonetheless, using WWVH is really a creative idea.  I'd like to see you
> run with that one!
>
> (On the tuned circuits:  The receiver itself will only accept a standard
> that is very very close to the internal reference -- if it drifts off,
it'll
> be rejected.  So you aren't substituting an LC tank for your TCXO...)
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> >73,
> >Mark
> >
> >P.S. You make the decision. I'm not going to pay to repair your RX340 if
it
> >blows up <g>.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
> >To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 13:56 PM
> >Subject: Re: [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > This has given me some ideas for synchronizing signals
> > > > around the shack,  including the use as an ultra-high stability
> > > > reference for my RX-340....
> > > > I just ordered the set from www.buylegacy.com
> > >
> > > Hmmm,  well I am tempted,  but....
> > >
> > > I live maybe 11 miles East of the WWVH antenna farm
> > > here on Kauai.  I suspect the  ground wave signals I rcv
> > > from them here have pretty good time accuracy,  hi.
> > >
> > > They are available at 2.5 (an omni antenna), 5, 10, and
> > > 15 MHz from VH.  How many nanoseconds per mile at
> > > light speed?  Doppler shift on ground wave?
> > >
> > > Is there a real point in my also ordering a GPS time standard?
> > > Or,  should I spend the $350 to be sure?
> > >
> > > 73,  Jim  KH7M
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >TenTec mailing list
> >TenTec@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> --
> Eric F. Richards
> efricha@dimensional.com
> "The weird part is that I can feel productive even when I'm doomed."
>   - Dilbert
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>