TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20
From: ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman)
Date: Tue Jun 24 15:18:34 2003
Dave,

I'll sell you a used Hot Water 101 Cheep !   :)

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Heil" <k8mn@earthlink.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20


> WD4K wrote:
> >
> > This Orion testing has gone from questionable to absolutely ridiculous.
> > Isn't anyone here going to question statements of personal opinion
cloaked
> > as fact??
>
> For days now I've been sitting and reading these comparisons and I'm
> beginning to think that I have no idea what makes a good receiver and
> what makes a bad receiver.  Over the past twenty or so years I've owned
> Drake ("full Sherwood") C-Lines, TR-7's, the Ten-Tec Paragon and the
> Omni VI (option 3).  I've used TS-930's, TS-940's, TS-950's, TS-830's,
> TS-850's, TS-870's, FT-1000D's, FT-1000MP's, FT-1000MP Mk V's, FT-1000MP
> Fields and, oh yes, FT-757's (various incarnations).  I've had the Orion
> for about a month-and-a-half.  It has been my opinion that it has the
> finest receiver I've ever used.  Now I'm filled with self-doubt.  I'm
> beginning to think I should sell the piece of crap and buy a second-hand
> FT-757 ;-)
>
> What to do, what to do...
>
> Dave Heil K8MN
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>