Stan Jacox wrote:
>
> Ed
> I have responded in a timely manner to the only two messages I got from you.
> The morning of 9/1/2003 you did not offer to buy the two units, but you did
> ask me for a deal, but offered no price.
> Within minutes I responded asking whether a discounted price for the two was
> good for you.
> I hear nothing in return.
> I received several offers in the meantime from people who seemed sincere and
> I accepted the first one who agreed to my fair price.
> Finally 6 hours later in the afternoon you wrote to say since I offered a
> price, you assumed we had a consummated deal. In the mean time.
> I write back within minutes reporting that since I did not hear back from
> you and you never mentioned a price or an offer, that you probably had other
> plans. Did I not tell you that the KWM-2 and 312B-4 were sold within
> minutes of your delayed response?
> That was the last contact with you until you posted this crazy letter.
>
> I have a few questions.
> One, why do you word your questions and statements( highly inaccurate
> statements, remember I have date and time stamps to show the details and
> timing of the emails) as if I am dishonest or a pirate?
> Why did you not offer a counter price if my asking price was not of interest
> to you?
> Why did you not respond to my offer to lower the price if you took both
> right away?
>
> The people I sold the equipment to were all reasonable and sincere people,
> one picked up his new Titan tonight after a too-many-hour-but fascinating
> conversation..
> Your accusatorial tone is unfair and very unreasonable, do you treat all
> others this way?
>
> Stan Jacox
> KM6XZ....and yes I am in the callbook and have been since 1959.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hobbes" <hobbestg@voicenet.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:24 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] Was Anyone Able To Do Business With KM6XZ?
>
> > To the Group,
> >
> > This past Monday (9/1/03) a Stan Jacox, KM6XZ posted a listing of gear
> > that he wanted to dispose of before leaving on September 15th for St.
> > Petersburg, Russia. I responded to him directly at KM6XZ@hotmail.com.
> > He accepted my offer for two pieces of equipment in his listing.
> > However, every attempt to contact him subsequently has not been
> > answered. In my response to him I asked him for a current address and a
> > phone number where I could contact him directly if I had any additional
> > questions since there was no listing for KM6XZ in any of the "online"
> > callbooks.
> >
> > Was anyone successful in obtaining any of the equipment he listed? Just
> > curious. Thanks for reading this e-mail.
> >
> > Ed K2ZE
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
Stan,
Part of your answer is correct and parts of it are not. Yes, you are
correct in saying that you gave me a price on the Titan and 312B-4. I
responded back via e-mail that I accepted your price for the both units,
and made an inquiry as to the amount for shipping. In that same e-mail
I also asked for your current address and phone number in case I had any
other questions about the two units.
Until I received this e-mail from you, to which I am responding, I heard
nothing despite the fact that I sent you 3 additional e-mails.
I guess that I can chalk this entire scenario up to my reliance on
e-mails. However, I find it to be more than coincidental that you
somehow received the particular e-mail where I wondered if anyone else
had difficulty in getting in touch with you, but you never received any
of the others I sent to you.
Hope this clears up the issue. 73 Ed K2ZE
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|