| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:35:42 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
|
Comparing an 8 foot mobile antenna with a 130 (I am guessing) foot
dipole and claiming the difference in performance is because of
resonance is a bit silly. Are there any other differences between that
dipole and the mobile antenna that you can think of that might affect
it's radiation efficiency? I can think of a few. DE N6KB
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | VS: [TenTec] ORION and PC, elstar-mt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question..., Dudley Hurry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question..., Stuart Rohre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question..., Dudley Hurry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |