To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | VS: VS: [TenTec] Orion and PTT |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:08:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
OH3LX wrote: Bill , If you set off internal keyer , you can key Orion from Front panel paddle connector. It works like PTT. I do not know what says factory of this ? Yes, but that is what is normally called Semi-Breakin for keying the amplifier, and is exactly what I am doing now but using the back panel AUX I/O PTT input instead of the front panel KEY input. You hit the paddle, Orion's TX relay closes and also sends a signal to the amplifier relay. I also adjust the TX EXT T/R Delay to 90% to give the amplifier relay time to close. My main amp uses a vacuum relay but my backup amp is a frame relay so I chose a long delay in case I need to switch quickly between amps. What I mean by PTT for CW is the following: 1. I depress my footswitch. 2. Orion's TX relay closes and stays closed until footswitch released. 3. The amplifier relay closes and stays closed until released. This is EXACTLY how Orion operates in SSB, but in CW, Orion opens and closes its internal TX relay for each dot or dash. Of course this gives you QSK, but I don't like this for several reasons: 1. You must adjust the delay to take into account the speed of your amplifier TX relay (vacuum relays are fast but frame relays are slow) to avoid hot-switching the amplifier relay (which can cause reliability problems in addition to clicks). 2. I don't like the idea of Orion's TX relay unnecessarily opening and closing for each element being sent. Why? Because reed relays, which is what Orion's TX relay sounds like, have a finite number of closures because they are mechanical. In my former life I worked as GM of an HP division that used many reed relays in switch matrices for automatic board testing, data acquisition, etc. We did extensive life tests of reed relays and I recall them being in the order of 1M closures. I don't know about the rest of you but 1M closures does not sound like a lot to me (assume an average of 3 elements per character, 5 characters per word, 30 WPM, 10% transmit cycle, 48 hour contest, 6 contests per year, and you get to ~.75M cycles per year, not counting normal DX-ing, rag-chewing, etc.) 3. In defense of Ten-Tec, I have my original 1984 vintage TS-930S which still has it's original TX reed relay (it even sounds identical to Orion's). However, Kenwood allowed you to choose whether to use QSK or PTT, and I seldom used QSK ( which may be why the relay still works FB!) Anyhow, I was told several times that PTT CW in Orion was "impossible"...but as we all know, nothing is impossible! Time will tell... So far the most elegant solution to this issue is to PTT the amplifier directly and let Orion run in its normal QSK mode, even though I still have the concerns stated above about Orion's relay lifetime. I have a 2-year warranty so I'm OK for at least the next 2 years. 73, Bill W4ZV
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Minimum power necessary (long), Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VS: [TenTec] Orion and PTT?, K3BU |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] CW breakin, Paul DeWitte K9OT |
Next by Thread: | Re: VS: [TenTec] Orion and PTT, Carl Moreschi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |