| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion |
| From: | "Tom Sessions" <k4rv@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Sessions <k4rv@mindspring.com>, tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:16:45 -0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message -----
From: <K8bvj@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 15:08
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion
> In a message dated 12/13/2003 10:06:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> k1uo@prexar.com writes:
>
> > "what matters is how any one radio performs
> > for YOU! That is the only thing that matters. In real world
> > conditions,
> > does the radio do what you want it to do and are you happy with it. "
> >
> > Don't know anything about all those numbers flying around but the
> > ORION worked REALLY well for me in the CQWW CW single band 160!
> >
> > I'm happy and not at all disappointed in the performance on any band
> > or operating conditions.
> >
> > Thats it from here...have a "Merry Christmas" !
> >
> > Larry - K1UO
> >
>
> AMEN!
>
that's a BIG 10-4 !! same goes for real antennas vs models
\_______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion, Paul Christensen, Esq. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion, Bob Henderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion, K8bvj |
| Next by Thread: | [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion, Bob Henderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |