To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 25 Dec 2003 17:44:53 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I wrote: >3. SNIP This could also have to do with the shaped CW elements Orion uses described below. This may make the elements sound lighter to my ear since the Rise/Fall time is probably shorter. That didn't come out right. What I mean is that the Rise/Fall portion of the waveform may be longer than with previous radios, making the fully ON portion of the waveform shorter for a given total element length which is determined by keying speed. This would make the element sound lighter since the fully ON portion of the waveform is shorter than radios with faster (and therefore clicking) rise and fall times. Sorry if I confused anyone! 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Kilovac relay source?, Michael Melland, W9WIS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Re: PDP-11, Adam Farson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Sinisa Hristov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, K3BU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |