| To: | tentec@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion | 
| From: | Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net> | 
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com | 
| Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:31:08 -0600 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
| I have tried the bazooka and double bazooka antennas in the past. I just had to find out what all the rave was about. Yes they are quieter than a wire dipole and yes they are broader than a wire dipole. But so is my 50 ohm dummy load. I have found and concur as stated earlier. The results of the antenna are due to high radiation loss. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 
 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] eHam!, Richard Detweiler | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re: eHam!, Martin Ewing | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, Ken Brown | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, JAMES HANLON | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |