TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] QSK speed versus firmwave version

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK speed versus firmwave version
From: "Phil Howlett" <w9xx@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 09:10:54 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Found the same thing when I went back to 1.369 to check QSK.

W9XX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 8:58 AM
Subject: [TenTec] QSK speed versus firmwave version


> FWIW, I've done some test recording of Orion's
> receiver audio recovering from qsk xmsn at various
> speeds with a carrier on frequency, for firmware
> 1.367, 1.369 and 1.370 and don't see any difference at
> all (d'oh)!
> 
> BTW, I also tested my Corsair I and it's qsk recovery
> speed is about the same as the Orion.
> 
> I'm not a real qsk fanatic so for me this is one big
> non-issue anyway.  The Orion is quite a complex system
> so I expect there to be a bit of overhead (delay) in
> transitioning from transmit to receive compared to
> simple hardware-only rigs.   
> 
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>