TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III

To: hank@att.net, hanknospam@att.net, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III
From: Jim <jlboockh@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:04:46 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ten Tec has been selling Centurions for a long time and probably sold a lot of them.

I have been very happy with mine. It was originally sold in June 1995 to K7TS who, as I recall, replaced it with a Titan. I bought it from him in 1997.

A TT tech, Gary Greene, suggested to me in 1997 a mod for it to correct a design defect in early Centurions. I replaced the power supply resistors, those in parallel with the filter capacitors, with some of a higher voltage rating. He sent me the resistors free of charge. I don't recall having arcing with this amp, but that may be the source of the arcing problem reported in the QST review.

As far as I know, Gary Greene is no longer with Ten Tec.

I'll bet someone on the reflector has both amps and can give a good comparison.

Jim N4AL

HENRY PFIZENMAYER wrote:

Like to hear some opinions on the new Centurian versus the Titan III . If I
am gonna order the Centurian , I want to do it this week.
.
. snip
.
 One thing > that continues to pop out at me is the number of Centurians
for sale used - always wonder why - surely 1000 vs 1500 watts
is not the issue.

In a different message:


I was somewhat concerned about the QST review that said they had arcing - that was about 1992 - so I would assume by now if that was an issue Tentec would have it resolved. (I tried to get some info from ARRL/ the guy who did the review but so far no answer..



Thanks - Hank K7HP


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>