| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Re: Orion subreceiver |
| From: | "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:54:40 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
As a side note,The use of the sub-rx for diversity reception greatly increases copy when you are using compromised antennas as well. This is true for any band but more so on 160/80. I use a Butternut HF9V 26' vertical and a W9INN 42' dipole. Both are marginal receive antennas to say the least, but combined with diversity stereo reception, many unreadable signals at least becomes readable. It's the difference of knowing when to send your call and if the reply was for you in a pile up for a weak signal. It's the difference between a QSO and no QSO. It isn't going to compete with a beverage or pennant on 160/80 but it definately helps. This one capability of the Orion makes it worth the cost and learning curve to me. Another advantage of stereo reception is I can easily switch TX antenna to the antenna that is receiving the best at the moment I'm ready to call. Although I almost always use the vertical for TX, There have been a few cases where the horizontal phase was readable on the other end when the vertical was not. Having the Sub-RX equal to the Main RX isn't as important unless there are strong near by signals causing the IMD, Yet it would be usefull as mentioned to have identical receivers. Perhaps what is needed are 3 receivers. 2 very good receivers with all associated roofing filters, then a General coverage receiver as the Sub RX is now. Best 73's Rich K5SF From: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU) Reply-To: tentec@contesting.com To: tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:17:16 -0500 "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com> wrote: >This may be another opportunity for INRAD. I think their roofing filter >for the MP is 75mhz.Yes, and the 4Khz wide filter showed no improvement in the MP's close-in cw performance. The Omni VI and Orion fitted with the 600hz (9Mhz) roofing filter performs so far above the nearest competition in tight 160M condx that it makes me want to avoid vhf i.f.'s. (Omni VI performance based on assumption and initial glowing reports from W2VJN).73, Barry N1EU __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service.As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/registerNetscape. Just the Net You Need. New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver, Duane - N9DG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver, Barry N1EU |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver, Carl Moreschi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver, Barry N1EU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |