Yes of course I adjusted the "threshold". I spent hours fiddling with
all the agc adjustments. I even followed the detailed instructions
someone seems to have dedicated their life to and posted on some web
site. How come the Omni VI's agc works fine without all those
adjustments anyway?
N4LQ
-----Original Message-----
From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:30:02 -0800
Subject: RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!
> Steve, did you adjust the threshold?
>
> I used my Orion is a thunderstorm during the IOTA contest last summer
> and
> compared it to the TS-850. After adjusting the AGC, it was fantastic,
> hearing things while the 850's AGC was recovering.
>
> Some have suggested I should have turned down the RF gain on the 850.
> Was too late to try it.
>
> 73
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of n4lq
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:22 AM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!
>
> Barry:
> One thing that bothered me about the Orion was how the agc responded to
> static. I've noticed this characteristic in a few other receivers where
> a burst of static tends to totally mute the receiver and blip out a cw
> character. I had a TS-570 which did the exact same thing. I tend to
> blame it on an overactive agc. At first I thought I could juggle the
> agc
> parameters, decreasing the attack and decay time, but nothing
> seems to help. At the time I had the Orion, I was comparing it with a
> PROII. The PROII did not react to static the same way. My Omni VI's agc
> seems to almost ignore static and the cw comes right on through.
> So I really don't know what to call this phenomena. Don't get me wrong.
> The Orion's agc does a good job of keeping the audio level on an even
> keel and it doesn't have any problems with overshoot but it just seems
> to over react.
>
>
> N4LQ Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU)
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:35:48 -0500
> Subject: RE: [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux!
>
> > n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU) wrote:
> >
> > >I still think the Orion could do a better job with the basics of
> weak
> > signal reception.
> >
> > Apologies, but I really should have qualified this statement. I've
> > posted before about my own comparisons that showed the Orion gives up
> > nothing to the FT-1000D in this regard. The Orion is as good as the
> > competition, I just wish it were as superior in this respect as it is
> > in close-in selectivity/IM immunity. I've yet to see dsp of any
> flavor
> > by any manufacturer as a consistent advantage in reading weak cw
> > signals in noise, but I'm hopeful that it's just a matter of time
> till
> > we have more powerful processing and smarter firmware algorithms.
> >
> > 73,
> > Barry N1EU
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________
> > Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
> > As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at
> > http://isp.netscape.com/register
> >
> > Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
> >
> > New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
> > Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
> > Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|