TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"
From: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Reply-to: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:14:09 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
AM forever! - read the article:

"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules
continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent
sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth
limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively. (In ISB, or
independent sideband, each sideband of a double-sideband signal
carries information or data independent of the other.)"

Apparently there is no sympathy for us old spark gap operators. :-(

73, Martin AA6E

On 4/14/05, Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> wrote:
> On the ARRL web site there is a new article today describing the ARRL's
> present plan for "regulation by bandwidth". The plan appears to disallow
> AM operation on all the MF/HF bands except for 10 Meters. Maximum
> bandwidth they are showing for all MF/HF bands (except 10 meters) is 3
> kHz. That would mean 1.5 kHz audio top end for DSB AM.
> 
> Think they'll get any comments on this?
> 
> DE N6KB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


-- 
martin.ewing@gmail.com
http://blog.aa6e.net
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>