TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re (Ten Tec) (ot) FCC says CW dead?

To: Carl Moreschi <n4py@arrl.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re (Ten Tec) (ot) FCC says CW dead?
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:14:15 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The re-farming of the HF bands will most likely have specific  "narrow band" 
segments for things like CW and narrow band digital modes.  This sure 
doesn't look like the FCC has any plans to abolish the CW usage, only the 
requirement for obtaining a license.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re (Ten Tec) (ot) FCC says CW dead?


> There's nothing that says CW is going away.  It is just no longer going to
> be required to have a license.  Anyone that gets a license will truely be
> missing something if they never learn and operate CW.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> Franklinton, North Carolina
> n4py@earthlink.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lyle Dunlap" <lyle3dd@grics.net>
> To: <TenTec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:12 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] Re (Ten Tec) (ot) FCC says CW dead?
>
>
>> CW may be going out but its mainly due to lazy minds.  Of course
> commercial interests involved too, but that is a separate subject.
>>
>>  I am 81 years old and prefer operating CW at  60 to 70 WPM full QSK.  A
> computer is not necessary.  I use a keyboard, a Ten Tec transceiver, a
> keyer, pair of headphones, and usually an amp.
>> Years ago we did not have the means of sending faster CW so everyone was
> stuck with dit dah where 40 WPM was about tops with a bug.
>>
>> Slower speeds is work, you have to put characters together to make a 
>> word.
> At higher speeds you listen to words and/or phrases and one can have a
> meaningful conversation.   Remember,full QSK . None of this novice fone
> procedure "back to you stuff"  and spending a half hour simply to find out 
> a
> fellows age and how long he has had a ham ticket.
>>
>> I could go on but I suppose I have  said enough, for now anyway.
>>
>> Lyle
>> W9FCX
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>