To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] cw testing / return policy correction |
From: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:41:43 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I'd like to correct the record; K7VO mistakenly wrote this: --- "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> wrote: there are no CW exclusive sub-bands.
73, Caity K7VO/8 I never wrote that. here is what I wrote: Unless I missed something there are vast expanses of non-phone freqencies for hams on HF. but cw can be operated anywhere, even in the phone subbands! you are complaining? Further, there are completely unoccupied backwaters where it is possible to operate cw almost in secret. the slice between 3725 and 3750 is one of them. I was responding to this: <<<It will make a difference for those who do operate CW, because there are no CW exclusive sub-bands. >>> which I was not the author of. not a big deal, but I just want to set the record straight. rob/k5uj _________________________________________________________________ Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Extra class license, Ron Notarius |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Return policy, Ken Brown |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] WANTED WANTED WANTED, Curt |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] The future of The Orion I, Chuck Gerarden |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |