TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal)

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal)
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:44:58 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The original post indicated that the IMD was zero beat with the incoming 
signal.  Makes me wonder what part of zero isn't understood.  Either it is 
zero beat producing a sum signal (Fa + Fb) which is not heard and a 
difference signal (Fa - Fb) which is zero, again not heard.  Has nothing to 
do with what frequency one prefers to listen to CW.  If one understands what 
zero beat means then I need not explain further.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:44 AM
Subject: [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal)


> 5B4AGN wrote:
> >Well that depends upon what it is zero beat with.  If it is zero beat 
> >with
> your listening frequency, then you are correct, assuming the IMD product 
> is
> an unmodulated carrier.  However, I think zero beat in this context means
> "on the same frequency as the signal you are attempting to receive". In 
> that
> case, the problem is rather more significant.
>
>         Apparently K4TAX listens to CW
> signals at 0 Hz Pitch...and I thought
> I liked a low pitch at 270 Hz!  :-)
>
>                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>