| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] QST AD |
| From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:50:45 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
K4IA"
>I'd like to see harder hitting reviews with some critical discussion. The
only place you can get the ugly side of things is by reading the comments on
eHam and they are not very scientific.
Don't read QST or eHam reviews. Learn to read
ARRL's Expanded Test Reports. The real unvarnished
data is there if you know how to interpret it. If
you don't, read KC1SX's article here:
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/0408032.pdf
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] QST AD, K4IA |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion II ad in QST, Don Rasmussen |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] QST AD, Chortek, Robert L |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] QST AD, joel hallas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |