| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 400 Hz CW |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:06:30 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I was suggesting this as one possible cause of more hearing damage at high frequencies versus the low end. Also loud noises tend to have more harmonic content (higher frequencies) as the mechanically vibrating objects or electronic circuits producing or transferring the sound are driven in to nonlinear modes. This type of hearing loss would be associated with damage inside the cochlea and desensitization of the nerves that respond to the high end. Of course there are many other causes or hearing loss related to changes in the mechanics of the ear drum and the little bones.> Low frequency audio into the ear canal is a bit like VHF RF into a microwave waveguide. Energy transfer from outside to the ear drum is no doubt much more efficient at higher audio frequencies. I take care of my hearing by limiting my exposure to loud sounds. I cover my ears and go away immediately when I think a sound my be loud enough to cause damage. I'm almost 50 and I think my hearing is better than most people both younger and older than me. Probably ought to get a hearing test to find out for sure. DE N6KB |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] QSK Bug in O2 2.031, Ron Castro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] New Orion II and FSK Cable, Dusty Chapman |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] 400 Hz CW, Bill Tippett |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] 400 Hz CW, Bill Tippett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |