TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter
From: "Williams, Barry" <Barry.Williams@nov.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:31:08 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Seconded on the Drake R-8B, great receiver, not quite up with the
R-390A/Sherwood SE-3, but close, and much easier to use.  After letting
my first go, I got another within a couple of months, you can also use
it on the ham bands, it does have a weird method of calculating CW
frequencies (displays actual carrier frequency, not carrier frequency
plus offset).  Only a problem on digital and CW, just remember you are
reading about 800 hertz low.

Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Larry DiGioia
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:12 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI vs. Jupiter

What you want is the Drake R8B.
There's one available on a certain highly-regarded auction site right 
now for $700.


junque wrote:

>Gentlemen,
>After enjoying TT equipment for the past 30 years, but not being  
>endowed with a sufficient income to purchase new equipment, I am the  
>happy recipent of an inherited OMNI VI/opt1 transceiver.  I still can  
>not afford to purchase an Orion (and after reading the list for the  
>past month, I'm not sure I would want to!) but I would like to have  
>something that includes general coverage receive.
>
-- 
Larry  N8KU

 w w w . l o n g w i r e . c o m
    100% CW     100% HF

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>