TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Bug

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Bug
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:14:15 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Here it is:

http://www.ronc.users.sonic.net/LF%20Freq%20Response.JPG


Ron N6AHA

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Bug


>I don't have an opinion about O2 sound vs O1 (V1) or O1 (V2), but I would
> like to see measurements instead of comments like "not robust".  I haven't
> got a clue what robust sound is!
>
> 73 Martin AA6E
>
> On 4/5/06, Toby Pennington <toby423@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I haven't heard a really good sounding O2 yet.  OK, Yes,  but not like 
>> the
>> robust audio coming out of the V1 firmware on the Classic Orion.   Toby
>> W4CAK
>>
>>
> --
> martin.ewing@gmail.com - AA6E@arrl.net
> President, Yale University Amateur Radio Club - W1YU
> http://blog.aa6e.net
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>