TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Bug

To: wb5jnc@gulseth.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Bug
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:08:12 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Al and all,

> Also, I had to think about this for a minute -- I believe Ken is mixing his 
> transmitter models (not that it's any big deal, just brings back memories HI 
> HI!!) RCA used _4-400s_ in the BTA 1R transmitter at the small-town AM 
> station I worked for early in my broadcast career. 
>   

I may be wrong about the model number (thought it was BT1K), I am sure 
the old RCA TX at KVEC 920 kHz in San Luis Obispo used four 833As. It 
probably was a parallel pair, and not push-pull finals. Definitely 
push-pull modulator. They also had a newer TX (brand name I can't 
remember, NOT RCA) that used 4-400s. That one was purchased used from a 
station formerly on 1030 kHz (or something like that) and the "engineer" 
(not a General Class or better ham by the way) neglected to retune the 
second harmonic trap from 2060 kHz to 1840 kHz. They had quite a signal 
on 160 meters. In fact it exceeded FCC part 73 rules. They refused to do 
anything about it until I made measurements and sent the results to the FCC.

DE N6KB

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>