| To: | geraldj@storm.weather.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C self-test |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:39:52 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> More recent Tentecs mix the PTO to 27 MHz to take the difference > for 18 MHz which puts the normal sideband on lower which doesn't match > the rest of thee world, but it removes nearly all of the transmitter > spur. > And when using a crystal filter to reject the unwanted sideband, instead of using the phasing method of SSB generation, the unwanted sideband rejection is not degraded when using the "non-normal" sideband. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] OMNI V . 9, jack |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Orion 1.373b5 Audio, Merle Bone |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C self-test, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C self-test, Ron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |