To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph |
From: | John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net> |
Reply-to: | na9u@arrl.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:52:06 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> My next door neighbor and I (when we were 5 or 6) > used string and tin-cans. > We could understand everything each of us said as > well :-) Yes, we know string works for short distances:) However, if you speak into the microphone of an amatuer radio transciever and they guy on the other end of the QSO understands you, hasn't the objective been achieved? Most keep their filters set at 3000 Hz or 2400 Hz so anything more than that is just wasting bandwidth. I really don't understand the fuss. 73, John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph, Grant Youngman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph, Toby Pennington |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph, Grant Youngman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph, Grant Youngman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |